RELATIONSHIPS; Which of the 7 Types of Love Relationships Fits Yours?


Psychology is a sub-discipline of biology, whose focus is on how organisms, organ systems, organs, cells, and bio-molecules carry out the chemical or physical functions that exist in a living system. It is the scientific study of normal mechanisms, and their interactions within an environment (more precisely an ecosystem which works within a living system or organism according to scholars, particularly Biologists in the discipline of academia, whose views vary from those of Sociologists the likes of Neuro-Physiologist Dr. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) the Father of Psychoanalysis and how he would define it).  The discipline continues to struggle with the question of how to define love, and after decades of research, is no closer to the ultimate answer, leaving an obvious study gap. However, the triangular theory of love proposed by University of Wyoming’s Robert Sternberg provides a fascinating and useful theoretical framework. The triangle here is not a true “love triangle,” but instead is the shape used to represent love’s three main dimensions.

It is easiest to understand the theory by looking at this figure.  Each point of the triangle represents the extreme of one of the dimensions of love. At the top of the triangle is the extreme of intimacy, which is the extent to which your relationship is characterized by feelings of closeness, connectedness, and strong emotional bonds. The commitment pole on the bottom right reflects your decision to stay in the relationship. People who are strongly committed to their relationship make a vow to stay in that relationship through thick and thin and are therefore willing to work hard to keep it going even if the thin outweighs the thick (a speculation for now). Finally, passion on the bottom left reflects the intensity of your sexual desire toward your partner. This desire may take the form of romantic attachment as well as strong sexual attraction.

Sternberg’s model predicts that as your relationship ripens, passionate love mellows into companionate love.  If you’re lucky, the flames of passion remain alive, and you experience consummate love. Strong sexual attraction helps spice things up, but more important for relationships to last are commitment and intimacy. The feelings of sharing, having mutual goals, and enjoying your time together in a quieter and more reflective way are what build lasting emotional bonds.

Returning to the triangular model, Sternberg’s theory describes a total of 7 types of relationships:

  • Consummate (the highest form)- High on all three dimensions (represented by a point in the middle of the triangle)
  • Infatuated- High on passion only
  • Fatuous- High on passion and commitment
  • Empty- High on commitment only
  • Companionate- High on intimacy and commitment
  • Romantic- High on intimacy and passion
  • Liking/friendship High on intimacy only

Now that you have this framework in mind, you’re probably wondering how your closest relationship measures up along these dimensions. Read these brief descriptions, and for each one, see which comes closest to your closest relationship. Don’t peek at the ratings until you’re done:

1.  You have been together for several years, still feel very close and connected emotionally, but do not always feel the same passion toward one another as you once did.

2.  You have a strong sexual drive and a need for physical and romantic contact with each other, but do not feel very close to each other. You have not planned for your future together, and in fact, have not even thought about any form of long-term commitment.

3.  You have been married or cohabiting for a long time and still verbally proclaim your love for each other, but admit to having lost much of the emotional connectedness, as well as the sexual desire that you once had.

4. After more than 6 years together, you are as “in love” as ever. You remain close and connected, very sexually and romantically in sync, and are completely committed to each other and to your relationship.

5. You have been together for only a couple of months, and although you feel you have become close and are connected emotionally, you have yet to become passionately involved or think about your future commitment.

6. You are in love and have a strong sexual desire for one another, are very close and connected emotionally, but have yet to discuss any future plans that would include a decision to commit only to each other.

7. You have been together for a while and are planning on staying together. You continue to maintain a healthy and satisfying sex life, but say you do not feel very closely connected where emotion is concerned.


1. Companionate Love

2.  Infatuation

3.  Empty Love

4. Consummate Love

5.  Liking

6.  Romantic Love

7.  Fatuous Love

How did your relationship rate? It’s possible that you don’t fit completely into one category, as these are the extremes.  You can use that triangle to plot your relationship’s exact point.  Higher on intimacy and passion but not quite ready to make a commitment means that you’re starting to move from romantic love and into the consummate region.

This example shows that just as it can be useful to find out where your relationship fits in the triangle, it’s also helpful to remember that relationships are rarely static over time.  You don’t have to give up on a relationship that’s fatuous or empty because the relationship lacks either intimacy, passion, or both.  At least one study, though conducted on undergraduates (Madey & Rodgers, 2009), suggests that intimacy and commitment contribute to relationship satisfaction. Research on long-term relationships suggests, further, that passion in the form of wanting to be near your partner continues to predict a couple’s satisfaction.  You can dial up or down the dimension that’s in need of adjustment by working on that function of your relationship.

If you want to take this even further, ask your relationship partner to take this quick quiz. Perhaps you’ll be surprised to find out that what you think is an empty love is one that your partner finds has more passion and intimacy than you realize. Or you may find out that the relationship you think is consummate is one that your partner finds lacking in one of the three crucial dimensions.

Your partner’s happiness, as well as your own, can benefit from a candid discussion on where you feel you need to make those adjustments.  Relationship education, though intended for premarital counseling, can also help long-term couples gain skills and knowledge to prop up their ways of handling communication and conflict resolution.

Psychologists may still not have the ultimate definition of love, but the framework provided by the triangle theory can give you a practical tool to maximize the fulfillment you receive out of your closest ties.




  1. I grew up in Colorado but slowly gravitated back to my father”s roots in Massachusetts. Fifty years ago I started my first teaching job and witnessed my first Town Meeting in a small community in Vermont. Thirty years ago I was managing NEH grants for programs in public libraries to build civic virtue amongst New England citizenry. Five years ago I moved to Amherst, and its Town Meeting system convinced me I was home, home at last! Alas, as Thomas Wolfe once said, “You can”t go home again. Along with so many other harsh realities that come with so many birthdays, the fact that we have outgrown our TM is a tough truth to accept, but I take heart in the feeling that my “Yes vote is also a “No to the fatuous idea that we are Making America Great Again by pretending the world has not changed. Amherst TM is not the little piece of history I witnessed in 1967. It too has gained weight and lost its balance. Yes, I will feel a little melancholy and old when I go to the polls on Tuesday, but yes, I will be voting for the future, not the past.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here